🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.